Part 3: Security and resilience of systems: functions of the Secretary of State.

Part 3 would let the Secretary of State specify essential activities and regulators, set strategic priorities, make regulations imposing security duties (penalties capped at the greater of £17m and 10% of turnover) and issue a code of practice, with a report on the legislation at least every three years. Most of it depends on future regulations.

Clauses 24 to 43HL Bill 62, printed Checked
Last updated Status: not yet law. The Commons considers the Lords amendments on 24 November 2026.Sources: UK Parliament · HL Bill 62 · NIS Regulations 2018
Where this stands

This is a Bill, not law. It has not received Royal Assent, so every duty described here is proposed. Lords stages complete (Third Reading 2 November 2026). The Commons has not yet considered the Lords amendments.

Clause numbers, subsections and page numbers refer to HL Bill 62 (as amended on Report, printed 26 October 2026), checked against the Parliament Bills API on 9 November 2026. Numbers can change if the Commons amends or rejects Lords amendments.

Part 3 · Clauses 24 to 43Clause table

ClauseHeadingWhat it doesWho it affects
24Key definitions in Part 3Defines "network and information system", "essential activity" and "regulatory authority" for Part 3.Anyone carrying on, or supplying, an essential activity
25Statement of strategic priorities etcLets the Secretary of State designate a statement of Government priorities and objectives for regulators.Regulators; indirectly all regulated persons
26Consultation and procedure in relation to statementRequires consultation with regulators and a 40-day period in Parliament before a statement is designated.Regulators; Parliament
27Duties of regulatory authorities in relation to statementRegulators must have regard to the statement and seek to achieve its objectives.Regulators
28Report by Secretary of StateAnnual report to Parliament on how regulators are meeting their duties under clause 27.Regulators; Parliament
29Regulations relating to security and resilience of network and information systemsThe main power to make regulations on managing and reducing risks to systems used for essential activities.Organisations carrying on essential activities and their activity-critical suppliers
30Imposition of requirements on regulated personsRegulations may impose requirements on "regulated persons", including OES, RDSPs, RMSPs and critical suppliers.OES, RDSPs, RMSPs, critical suppliers and anyone else specified
31Functions of regulatory authorities: enforcement, sanctions and appealsRegulations may give regulators monitoring, investigation, inspection and sanction powers, with appeals.Regulated persons; regulators
32Functions of the Secretary of State: loss of control of artificial intelligence agentRegulations may give the Secretary of State powers where a compromise is or may be attributable to loss of control of an AI agent.Regulated persons whose systems involve AI agents
33Provision about financial penaltiesCaps penalties in Part 3 regulations at the greater of £17m and 10% of worldwide turnover.Regulated persons under clause 29 regulations
34Regulatory authorities, the Secretary of State and other persons: information, guidance and other functionsRegulations may cover information sharing, guidance, registers, reports, reviews and co-operation.Regulators and public bodies such as the NCSC
35Recovery of costs of regulatory authoritiesRegulations may let regulators charge regulated persons for their costs under Parts 3 and 4 and the NIS Regulations.Regulated persons
36Supplementary provision and interpretationLets regulations confer discretions, delegate functions and refer to guidance or codes; defines Chapter 3 terms.Drafting provision
37Code of practiceLets the Secretary of State issue a code of practice of recommended measures for compliance.Regulated persons
38Procedure for issue of code of practiceA draft code is laid before Parliament for 40 days and can be blocked by either House.Parliament; regulated persons
39Effects of code of practiceNot following the code is not of itself a breach, but courts and regulators must take it into account.Regulated persons; courts; regulators
40Withdrawal of code of practiceThe Secretary of State may withdraw the code after consultation and notice to Parliament.Regulated persons
41Report on network and information systems legislationA report to Parliament on the NIS legislation at least once every three years.Parliament; regulators
42Regulations under section 24 or Chapter 3Regulations may differ by purpose or area, apply to the Crown and UK waters, and amend primary legislation.Drafting provision
43Consultation and procedureRequires consultation and affirmative approval for the main Part 3 regulations.Parliament; anyone consulted on regulations

Chapter 1Introductory

Clause 24Key definitions in Part 3

Affects: Anyone carrying on, or supplying, an essential activityOfficial text: HL Bill 62, PDF page 58bills.parliament.uk#clause-24
What the Bill says

A "network and information system" is an electronic communications network (Communications Act 2003, section 32(1)) or apparatus programmed to process digital data, including data stored or transmitted for its operation, use, protection or maintenance (clause 24(1) and (2)).

An "essential activity" is one specified in regulations by the Secretary of State, who may only specify an activity considered essential to the economy, or to the day-to-day functioning of society, in the UK or any part of it (clause 24(3) and (4)). Every essential service in Schedule 2 to the NIS Regulations, and every relevant digital service and managed service, is treated as already specified (clause 24(5)).

A "regulatory authority" is a person exercising public functions in the UK designated by regulations; the existing NIS competent authorities and the Information Commission are treated as designated (clause 24(6) to (8)).

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: this is how the regime can grow without a new Act. New sectors could be brought in by regulations under clause 24(3), which require consultation and approval by both Houses (clause 43).

History. A Government drafting amendment agreed at Lords Third Reading on 2 November 2026 (not in the HL Bill 62 print) inserts "and (5)" after "section 30(2)" in clause 24(9), so the meaning of "regulated person" also draws on clause 30(5).

Chapter 2Statement of strategic priorities etc

Clause 25Statement of strategic priorities etc

Affects: Regulators; indirectly all regulated personsOfficial text: HL Bill 62, PDF page 60bills.parliament.uk#clause-25
What the Bill says

The Secretary of State may designate a statement setting out the Government's strategic priorities for the security and resilience of network and information systems used for essential activities, the roles and responsibilities of regulators and others, and objectives for regulators (clause 25(1) and (2)). It must be published.

It cannot be amended, and its designation cannot be withdrawn, within three years of the last designation, unless there has been a general election or the Secretary of State considers there has been a significant change in Government policy or in the nature of threats (clause 25(6) and (7)).

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: the statement replaces the old "NIS national strategy" in regulation 2 of the NIS Regulations, which Schedule 2 removes once the first statement is designated. Expect it to shape regulators' enforcement priorities.

Clause 26Consultation and procedure in relation to statement

What the Bill says

The Secretary of State must consult the regulators on a draft, allowing at least 40 days, make any appropriate changes, then lay the statement before Parliament. It cannot be designated until a 40-day period has passed, and cannot be designated if either House resolves within that period not to approve it (clause 26(2) to (6)). Consultation carried out before the clause comes into force counts (clause 26(8)).

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: this is a negative procedure. Parliament does not have to vote to approve the statement; it can only block it.

Clause 27Duties of regulatory authorities in relation to statement

What the Bill says

While a statement is designated, each regulator must have regard to it and seek to achieve any relevant objectives in it when exercising functions under the NIS Regulations, Part 3 or Part 4.

Clause 28Report by Secretary of State

What the Bill says

After each 12-month reporting period (starting when the first statement is published), the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament and publish a report on how regulators have complied, and plan to comply, with clause 27. The Secretary of State may require regulators to supply information for it.

Chapter 3Regulations about security and resilience of systems

Clause 29Regulations relating to security and resilience of network and information systems

Affects: Organisations carrying on essential activities and their activity-critical suppliersOfficial text: HL Bill 62, PDF page 62bills.parliament.uk#clause-29
What the Bill says

The Secretary of State may make regulations for identifying, managing and reducing risks of security or operational compromises to "relevant" network and information systems, and for mitigating their impact, including strengthening the resilience of those systems and the security of their physical environment (clause 29(1) and (2)).

A system is relevant if it is used for an essential activity or for an "activity-critical supply" (a supply of goods or services without which an essential activity would be at risk of disruption), or is associated with such a system (clause 29(3), (4) and (6)). A "security or operational compromise" covers anything that compromises security, availability, functionality or reliability, unauthorised access or interference, compromise of data, or loss of data (clause 29(5)).

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: this is the engine of Part 3. It allows future regulations to go beyond the NIS Regulations, including onto suppliers, without a new Act. Nothing in it applies to anyone until regulations are made.

Clause 30Imposition of requirements on regulated persons

Affects: OES, RDSPs, RMSPs, critical suppliers and anyone else specifiedOfficial text: HL Bill 62, PDF page 63bills.parliament.uk#clause-30
What the Bill says

Regulations under clause 29 may impose requirements on regulated persons, meaning persons specified (or of a description specified) who carry on an essential activity in the UK or provide an activity-critical supply, whether or not established in the UK (clause 30(1) to (3)). Specification can turn on designation by a regulator (clause 30(4)).

OES, RDSPs, RMSPs and critical suppliers (all as defined in the NIS Regulations) are treated as specified (clause 30(5)).

Requirements may include taking specified action (including outside the UK), prohibitions or restrictions, reporting, providing information, and appointing a UK representative (clause 30(6)).

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: clause 30(5) is why critical suppliers can be given duties by regulations even though Part 2 does not set any. The reach to "activity-critical supply" means suppliers can be brought in directly by regulations, not only through designation.

Clause 31Functions of regulatory authorities: enforcement, sanctions and appeals

What the Bill says

Regulations may give regulators functions for monitoring, investigating, securing compliance with and mitigating non-compliance with requirements under clause 29 regulations or the NIS Regulations (clause 31(1) and (2)). These may include appointing inspectors; entry, inspection and search; seizing documents; requiring information to be obtained or retained (including outside the UK); tests and interviews; and requiring remedial steps (clause 31(3)), subject to conditions such as producing identification or obtaining a warrant (clause 31(4)).

Where regulations provide for financial penalties they must provide for appeals to a court or tribunal (clause 31(6)(a)).

Clause 32Functions of the Secretary of State: loss of control of artificial intelligence agent

Affects: Regulated persons whose systems involve AI agentsOfficial text: HL Bill 62, PDF page 65bills.parliament.uk#clause-32
What the Bill says

Regulations under clause 29 may confer functions on the Secretary of State where a security or operational compromise of a relevant system is or may be attributable to loss of oversight or control of an "AI agent", or there is a risk of that (clause 32(1)).

"AI agent" and "loss of oversight or control" are to be defined by regulations (clause 32(2)). Functions may include imposing requirements on regulated persons in connection with identifying and investigating such compromises, preserving and analysing information, assessing causes and risks, and testing and sharing remedies (clause 32(5)), with inspector, entry, seizure, testing and direction powers (clause 32(6)) and sanctions including financial penalties (clause 32(9)).

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: this does not regulate AI developers as such. It lets the Government give itself an investigation and response role when an AI agent used in or around a regulated system goes wrong. Its reach will depend entirely on how the regulations define "AI agent".

History. Inserted at Lords Report stage (26 October 2026) on a Government amendment (Baroness Lloyd of Effra). Clauses 32 onwards in Part 3 were renumbered as a result.

Not settled by the text. The key terms "AI agent" and "loss of oversight or control" are left to regulations, which must be consulted on (clause 43(1)(d)).

Clause 33Provision about financial penalties

Affects: Regulated persons under clause 29 regulationsOfficial text: HL Bill 62, PDF page 67bills.parliament.uk#clause-33
What the Bill says

Regulations providing for penalties may set the amount or how it is worked out, including a daily rate, and must say how sums received are dealt with (clause 33(1) and (2)).

They must include a maximum: for an undertaking, no more than the greater of £17,000,000 and 10% of turnover (inside and outside the UK); otherwise no more than £17,000,000. They must say how turnover is determined and may treat group members or controllers as part of the undertaking (clause 33(3) and (4)). The £17m figures can be uprated for inflation (clause 33(5)).

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: 10% is the ceiling Parliament would allow, not a figure the regulations must use. It is higher than the 4% cap in the NIS Regulations (clause 21), so describing the Bill's maximum penalty as "£17m or 4%" is only true of Part 2.

Clause 34Regulatory authorities, the Secretary of State and other persons: information, guidance and other functions

Affects: Regulators and public bodies such as the NCSCOfficial text: HL Bill 62, PDF page 68bills.parliament.uk#clause-34
What the Bill says

Regulations may give regulators (and, where clause 32 is used, the Secretary of State) functions on disclosure of information (including to and from persons outside the UK), guidance, records and registers, reports, reviews, and co-operation (clause 34(1) and (2)). Disclosures under the regulations need not breach confidence, but nothing may authorise a disclosure prohibited by the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (clause 34(4) and (5)). Regulations may also give functions to other public bodies, such as monitoring incidents and promoting best practice (clause 34(6) and (7)).

Clause 35Recovery of costs of regulatory authorities

What the Bill says

Regulations may allow regulators to charge current or former regulated persons for costs of functions under Part 3, Part 4 or the NIS Regulations, including enforcement, through charging schemes covering amounts, exemptions, payment, interest and disputes. A charge need not relate to functions exercised in relation to the payer, and may take previous deficits into account.

Clause 36Supplementary provision and interpretation

What the Bill says

Regulations under clause 29 may confer discretionary functions, provide for delegation, require regard to guidance or a code of practice, and refer to documents as amended from time to time. Clause 36(2) collects the Chapter 3 definitions.

History. A Government drafting amendment agreed at Lords Third Reading on 2 November 2026 (not in the HL Bill 62 print) adds "(and see also section 30(5))" to the definition of "regulated person".

Chapter 4Code of practice

Clause 37Code of practice

What the Bill says

The Secretary of State may issue, revise and reissue a code of practice describing measures recommended for complying with requirements under clause 29 regulations or the NIS Regulations, after consulting such persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. It may make different provision for different kinds of regulated person.

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: expect the code to draw on NCSC material such as the Cyber Assessment Framework, though the Bill does not name it.

Clause 38Procedure for issue of code of practice

What the Bill says

A draft code must be laid before Parliament. If either House resolves not to approve it within 40 days, it cannot be issued in that form; otherwise it can be issued, and comes into force on publication unless it says otherwise.

Clause 39Effects of code of practice

Affects: Regulated persons; courts; regulatorsOfficial text: HL Bill 62, PDF page 72bills.parliament.uk#clause-39
What the Bill says

Failing to follow the code is not of itself evidence of a failure to comply with a requirement, and does not of itself create liability (clause 39(1)). The code is admissible in evidence, and courts, tribunals and regulators must take relevant provisions into account when deciding compliance questions about the period when they were in force (clause 39(2) to (4)).

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: the code is not mandatory, but departing from it means you would need to show your own measures met the legal duty. Documenting why you chose a different approach will matter.

Clause 40Withdrawal of code of practice

What the Bill says

Withdrawal requires consultation and a notice laid before Parliament, and takes effect at the end of 40 days unless the notice specifies otherwise.

Chapter 5Report on network and information systems legislation

Clause 41Report on network and information systems legislation

What the Bill says

At least once every three years from Royal Assent, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament and publish a report on the operation of the NIS Regulations, Parts 3 and 4 and regulations under Part 3. It must set out their objectives, assess whether they have been achieved and remain appropriate, consider less onerous alternatives, and review use of the Secretary of State's powers.

Chapter 6Regulations under Part 3

Clause 42Regulations under section 24 or Chapter 3

What the Bill says

Regulations under clause 24 or Chapter 3 may make different provision for different purposes or areas, apply to the Crown and to UK waters (internal waters, territorial sea and designated continental shelf areas), and make consequential provision, including amending or repealing primary legislation (Acts, Acts of the Scottish Parliament, Senedd legislation and Northern Ireland legislation).

What this means in practice (our interpretation)

Our reading: the power to amend Acts by regulations is a "Henry VIII" power. Clause 43(5) requires any such regulations to be approved by both Houses.

History. A Government drafting amendment agreed at Lords Third Reading on 2 November 2026 (not in the HL Bill 62 print) adds "(and see also section 30(5))" to clause 42(1)(a).

Clause 43Consultation and procedure

Affects: Parliament; anyone consulted on regulationsOfficial text: HL Bill 62, PDF page 75bills.parliament.uk#clause-43
What the Bill says

The Secretary of State must consult before making regulations on essential activities, regulatory authorities, the meaning of "AI agent" and "loss of oversight or control", extra matters for the clause 41 report, and most substantive clause 29 regulations (requirements, regulator functions, appeals, penalty caps, information sharing, cost recovery). Earlier consultation counts (clause 43(1) to (3)).

Regulations needing consultation, or amending primary legislation, must be approved in draft by both Houses; other regulations under Part 3 are subject to annulment by either House (clause 43(5) and (6)).

Get ready

Know where you stand before the duties land.

Take the free readiness assessment to see how your organisation measures up against the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, or talk to our team about a plan.